SIS FORUM (MALAYSIA) v. KERAJAAN NEGERI SELANGOR; MAJLIS AGAMA ISLAM SELANGOR (INTERVENER)

[2022] 3 MLRA 219
Federal Court, Putrajaya
Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat CJ, Rohana Yusuf PCA, Azahar Mohamed CJM, Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim CJSS, Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Vernon Ong, Zaleha Yusof, Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal, Rhodzariah Bujang FCJJ
[Case No: BKA-1-01-2021(W)]
Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat CJ, Rohana Yusuf PCA, Azahar Mohamed CJM, Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim CJSS, Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Vernon Ong, Zaleha Yusof, Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal, Rhodzariah Bujang FCJJ

JUDGMENT

Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat CJ:

Introduction

[1] This petition arose out of the decision of the High Court in an application for judicial review No WA-25-204-10-2014 ('JR No 204') wherein the present petitioner (the applicant there) sought to challenge the validity of a fatwa dated 17 July 2014 (ref no MAIS/SU/BUU/01-2/002/2013-3(4) and gazetted on 31 July 2014) ('Fatwa'). For completeness, the Fatwa is reproduced below:

"FATWA PEMIKIRAN LIBERALISM DAN PLURALISM AGAMA.

1. SIS FORUM (Malaysia) dan mana-mana individu, pertubuhan, atau institusi yang berpegang kepada fahaman liberalism dan pluralism agama adalah sesat dan menyeleweng daripada ajaran Islam.

2. Mana-mana bahan terbitan yang berunsur pemikiran-pemikiran fahaman liberalism dan pluralism agama hendaklah diharamkan dan boleh dirampas.

3. Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia (SKMM) hendaklah menyekat laman-laman sosial yang bertentangan dengan ajaran Islam dan Hukum Syarak.

4. Mana-mana individu yang berpegang kepada fahaman liberalism dan pluralism agama hendaklah bertaubat dan kembali ke jalan Islam."

[2] In the JR No 204 application, the petitioner sought, among others, for the following declarations: (i) to the extent the Fatwa implicitly provides for offences in relation to newspaper, publications, publishers, printing and printing presses, it is contrary to s 7 of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984; (ii) to the extent it directs Malaysian Communication and Multimedia Commission ('MCMC') to block social website, is contrary to s 3(3) of the MCMC Act 1998; (iii) a declaration that the Fatwa is in excess of arts 10, 11, 74 and List 1 and List 2 of the Ninth Schedule of the Federal Constitution; and (iv) a declaration that the petitioner being a company limited by guarantee incorporated under the Companies Act 1965 or any other party not able to profess the religion of Islam, cannot be subjected to the said Fatwa.

Sign up to view full cases Login