TINDAK MURNI SDN BHD v. JUANG SETIA SDN BHD & ANOTHER APPEAL

[2020] 2 MLRA 264
Federal Court, Putrajaya
Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat CJ, Azahar Mohamed CJM, Nallini Pathmanthan, Vernon Ong, Abdul Rahman Sebli FCJJ
[Civil Applications Nos: 03-2-11-2018 (B) & 02(i)-104-11-2018 (B)]
Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat CJ, Azahar Mohamed CJM, Nallini Pathmanthan, Vernon Ong, Abdul Rahman Sebli FCJJ

Judgment

Nallini Pathmanathan FCJ:

Introduction

[1] When the governing contract between two parties provides for an agreement to arbitrate, should that arbitration agreement be subordinated to a judgment in default obtained in court proceedings, contrary to the terms of the governing contract and effectively rendering the agreement to arbitrate, nugatory?

[2] This was the issue in the two related appeals before us. It necessarily involves a comprehension and application of s 10 of the Arbitration Act 2005.

[3] In the instant case, one of the contracting parties initiated court proceedings, notwithstanding the existence of an arbitration clause. As no appearance was entered by the other party, judgment in default was obtained. When an application to set aside the judgment in default fell to be determined, together with an application for a stay pending arbitration, the issues before the courts below included the following:

Sign up to view full cases Login